Numerical Simulation of Engineered Material Arrestor System (EMAS)

Akbarikermani, Amirhossein; Kalantary, Farzin

doi:10.61186/NMCE.467.1

Numerical Simulation of Engineered Material Arrestor System (EMAS)

Document Type : Research

Authors

Amirhossein Akbarikermani

Farzin Kalantary

Department of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

10.61186/NMCE.467.1

Abstract

With the increasing speed and weight of modern passenger aircraft, the need for longer runways has become more critical than ever. To address safety concerns, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has mandated a 305-meter (1,000-foot) safety zone, known as the Runway Safety Area (RSA), at the end of runways at major airports. However, in many cases, this requirement cannot be met due to natural or man-made obstacles within the airport's boundaries. As a solution, the implementation of an Engineered Material Arrestor System (EMAS) has been proposed. EMAS is designed to significantly reduce the stopping distance of aircraft during overrun events, minimizing both passenger discomfort and the risk of structural damage to the aircraft. The objective of this paper is to investigate and simulate the performance of EMAS using finite element analysis software capable of handling large deformation problems. The Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation is utilized to conduct large deformation analyses. In the simulations, three types of aircraft are modeled to enter a hypothetical EMAS bed at a speed of 70 knots (130 km/h). Additionally, three types of foam concrete with different densities are selected for the EMAS bed material. The results demonstrate that higher-density materials exhibit greater stiffness, resulting in shorter stopping distances for the aircraft. As expected, lower-density (softer) materials apply less force and deceleration to the aircraft. Furthermore, the findings indicate that lighter aircraft experience higher deceleration forces than heavier aircraft, regardless of the bed material. However, heavier aircraft generate higher overall impact forces during the overrun.

Keywords

Aircraft

Engineered Materials Arrestor System (EMAS)

Numerical simulation

Finite Element

Arbitrary Lagrangian- Eulerian

Subjects

Structural Engineering

[1] R. E. David, “Location of commercial aircraft accidents/incidents relative to runways,” Washington, DC, 1990.

[2] I. Kirkland, R. E. Caves, M. Hirst, and D. E. Pitfield, “The normalisation of aircraft overrun accident data,” J. Air Transp. Manag., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 333–341, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0969-6997(03)00033-4.

[3] J. Hall, M. Ayres, and D. Wong, Analysis of Aircraft Overruns and Undershoots for Runway Safety Areas. 2008.

[4] F. A. A. FAA, “Engineered materials arresting system (EMAS) for aircraft overrun.,” Washington, DC, 2005.

[5] C. H. Ho and P. Romero, “Investigation of existing engineered material arresting system at three U.S. Airports,” in 50th Annual Transportation Research Forum 2009, 2009.

[6] M. A. Barsotti, J. M. H. Puryear, and D. J. Stevens, Developing Improved Civil Aircraft Arresting Systems. 2009.

[7] E. Santagata, M. Bassani, and E. Sacchi, “Performance of New Materials for Aircraft Arrestor Beds,” no. 2177, pp. 124–131, 2010, doi: 10.3141/2177-15.

[8] E. Heymsfield, W. M. Hale, and T. L. Halsey, “A Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of Soft Ground Arrestor Systems,” Aviation. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007, doi: 10.1061/40938(262)20.

[9] E. Heymsfield, W. M. Hale, and T. L. Halsey, “Optimizing Low Density Concrete Behavior for Soft Ground Arrestor Systems,” Airfield and Highway Pavements. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008, doi: 10.1061/41005(329)11.

[10] E. Heymsfield, “Predicting aircraft stopping distances within an EMAS,” J. Transp. Eng., vol. 139, no. 12, pp. 1184–1193, 2013, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000600.

[11] Z. Q. Zhang, J. L. Yang, and Q. M. Li, “An analytical model of foamed concrete aircraft arresting system,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 61, pp. 1–12, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.05.006.

[12] H. H. Zhao and H. Bin Yu, “Modeling and analysis of arresting property of EMAS,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 989–994, pp. 2829–2833, 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.2829.

[13] Z. Q. Zhang and J. L. Yang, “Improving safety of runway overrun through foamed concrete aircraft arresting system: An experimental study,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 448–463, 2015, doi: 10.1080/13588265.2015.1033971.

[14] X. Yang, J. Yang, Z. Zhang, J. Ma, Y. Sun, and H. Liu, “A review of civil aircraft arresting system for runway overruns,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 102, no. July, pp. 99–121, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.07.006.

[15] N. Liu and H. Bin Yu, “The design of dynamic model of engineering material arresting system,” Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 607, pp. 435–439, 2014, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.607.435.

[16] S. Researcher, H. Pavement, and S. Technician, “Design, Analysis, and Asphalt Material Characterization for Road and Airfield Pavements GSP 246 © ASCE 2014 170,” pp. 170–177, 2014.

[17] ATSB, Runway Excursions Part 2: Minimising the Likelihood and Consequences of Runway Excursions, vol. 018, no. 2. 2008.

[18] P. K. Yadawa and R. R. Yadav, “Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures,” Multidiscip. Model. Mater. Struct., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 59–76, 2009, doi: 10.1108/15736105200900004.

[19] M. Nazem, J. P. Carter, and D. W. Airey, “Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method for dynamic analysis of geotechnical problems,” Comput. Geotech., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 549–557, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.11.001.

[20] C. W. Hirt, A. A. Amsden, and J. L. Cook, “An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds,” J. Comput. Phys., 1974, doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(74)90051-5.

[21] M. Bakroon, R. Daryaei, D. Aubram, and F. Rackwitz, “Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Finite Element Formulations Applied to Geotechnical Problems,” Numer. Methods Geotech., vol. 41, no. September, pp. 33–44, 2017, doi: 978-3-936310-43-6.

[22] E. Heymsfield, W. M. Hale, and T. L. Halsey, “Aircraft response in an airfield arrestor system during an overrun,” J. Transp. Eng., vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 284–292, 2012, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000331.