Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering

Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering

A Robust Fuzzy Model for Evaluating Defects in Building Elements

Document Type : Research

Authors
1 PhD Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate professor, Water Resources Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Imam Hossein Comprehensive University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
This study addresses the critical issue of building element defect management, focusing on prevalent concerns like cracks, dampness, and surface degradation. Recognizing the limitations introduced by human subjectivity in defect classification, the research proposes a novel, data-driven approach to automate the process. The methodology leverages extensive field data collection, encompassing 500 painted walls from 24 geographically dispersed buildings, to develop a robust fuzzy logic-based building element condition assessment model. The model categorizes element conditions (C1-C5) and classifies damage severity into five groups: no damage, slight damage, moderate damage, extensive damage, and complete damage, with nuanced precision. The efficacy of the fuzzy C-Means clustering is rigorously validated through the application of silhouette index and Davis-Bouldin index, ensuring optimal cluster formation and enhanced model accuracy. A real-world case study involving an office building exemplifies the model's practical application, showcasing its effectiveness in minimizing human error during defect identification and classification. This research contributes a sophisticated defect management framework informed by extensive field data and validated fuzzy logic, ultimately leading to demonstrably improved building quality and reduced operational costs within the construction industry.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Dejaco, M.C., F.R. Cecconi, and S. Maltese, Key performance indicators for building condition assessment. Journal of Building Engineering, 2017. 9: p. 17-28.
[2] Abbott, G., et al., Building condition assessment: a performance evaluation tool towards sustainable asset management. 2007.
[3] Linggar, S., A. Aminullah, and A. Triwiyono. Analysis of building and its components condition assessment case study of dormitory buildings. in MATEC Web of Conferences. 2019. EDP Sciences.
[4] Teicholz, P., BIM for facility managers. 2013: John Wiley & Sons.
[5] Wahida, R.N., et al., Building condition assessment imperative and process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. 65: p. 775-780.
[6] Ilter, D. and E. Ergen, BIM for building refurbishment and maintenance: current status and research directions. Structural survey, 2015. 33(3): p. 228-256.
[7] Farahani, A., H. Wallbaum, and J.-O. Dalenbäck, Optimized maintenance and renovation scheduling in multifamily buildings–a systematic approach based on condition state and life cycle cost of building components. Construction management and economics, 2019. 37(3): p. 139-155.
[8] Valero, L.R., V.F. Sasso, and E.P. Vicioso, In situ assessment of superficial moisture condition in façades of historic building using non-destructive techniques. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2019. 10: p. e00228.
[9] Matos, R., et al., Building condition assessment supported by Building Information Modelling. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021. 38: p. 102186.
[10] Degtyarev, G.V., K.A. Belokur, and I.V. Sokolova. Modeling of the building by numerical methods at assessment of the technical condition of structures. in Materials Science Forum. 2018. Trans Tech Publ.
[11] Nazarian, E., et al., Machine-learning-based approach for post event assessment of damage in a turn-of-the-century building structure. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2018. 8: p. 237-251.
[12] Saxena, R., K. Biplab, and D. Rakshit, Quantitative assessment of phase change material utilization for building cooling load abatement in composite climatic condition. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 2018. 140(1): p. 011001.
[13] Pärn, E.A., D.J. Edwards, and M.C. Sing, The building information modelling trajectory in facilities management: A review. Automation in construction, 2017. 75: p. 45-55.
[14] Standardization, I.O.f., ISO 55000: Asset Management-Overview, Principles and Terminology. 2014: International Organization for Standardization.
[15] Auffenberg, F., et al., A comfort-based approach to smart heating and air conditioning. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 2017. 9(3): p. 1-20.
[16] Zhao, Y., et al., Diagnostic Bayesian networks for diagnosing air handling units faults–part I: Faults in dampers, fans, filters and sensors. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017. 111: p. 1272-1286.
[17] Lee, S., et al., A Bayesian approach for probabilistic classification and inference of occupant thermal preferences in office buildings. Building and Environment, 2017. 118: p. 323-343.
[18] Bortolini, R. and N. Forcada, A probabilistic performance evaluation for buildings and constructed assets. Building Research & Information, 2020. 48(8): p. 838-855.
[19] Himeur, Y., et al., AI-big data analytics for building automation and management systems: a survey, actual challenges and future perspectives. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023. 56(6): p. 4929-5021.
[20] Kaewunruen, S., et al., Digital twins for managing railway bridge maintenance, resilience, and climate change adaptation. Sensors, 2022. 23(1): p. 252.
[21] Xia, Y., et al., A data‐driven approach for regional bridge condition assessment using inspection reports. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2022. 29(4): p. e2915.
[22] António Costa Branco de Oliveira Pedro, J., J. Ângelo Vasconcelos de Paiva, and A. José Dâmaso Santos Matos Vilhena, Portuguese method for building condition assessment. Structural Survey, 2008. 26(4): p. 322-335.
[23] Eweda, A., T. Zayed, and S. Alkass. An integrated condition assessment model for buildings. in Construction Research Congress 2010: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice. 2010.
[24] Straub, A., Dutch standard for condition assessment of buildings. Structural Survey, 2009. 27(1): p. 23-35.
[25] Cheng, B., et al., Comprehensive assessment of embodied environmental impacts of buildings using normalized environmental impact factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022. 334: p. 130083.
[26] Meng, F., X. Xiao, and J. Wang, Rating the crisis of online public opinion using a multi-level index system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.14740, 2022.
[27] Salom, J., et al., An evaluation framework for sustainable plus energy neighbourhoods: Moving beyond the traditional building energy assessment. Energies, 2021. 14(14): p. 4314.
[28] Wang, T., et al., A fast and robust convolutional neural network-based defect detection model in product quality control. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018. 94: p. 3465-3471.
[29]Torok, M.M., M. Golparvar-Fard, and K.B. Kochersberger, Image-based automated 3D crack detection for post-disaster building assessment. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2014. 28(5): p. A4014004.
[30] Perez, H., J.H. Tah, and A. Mosavi, Deep learning for detecting building defects using convolutional neural networks. Sensors, 2019. 19(16): p. 3556.
[31] Tien Bui, D., et al., A novel fuzzy K-nearest neighbor inference model with differential evolution for spatial prediction of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area using GIS. Landslides, 2017. 14: p. 1-17.
[32] Mishra, M., T. Barman, and G. Ramana, Artificial intelligence-based visual inspection system for structural health monitoring of cultural heritage. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2024. 14(1): p. 103-120.
[33] May, K.W., et al., The identification, development, and evaluation of BIM-ARDM: a BIM-based AR defect management system for construction inspections. Buildings, 2022. 12(2): p. 140.
[34] Golding, V.P., et al., Crack detection in concrete structures using deep learning. Sustainability, 2022. 14(13): p. 8117.
[35] Şen, Z., Supervised fuzzy logic modeling for building earthquake hazard assessment. Expert systems with applications, 2011. 38(12): p. 14564-14573.
[36] Amiri Shahmirani, M.R., et al., Application of fuzzy modelling to predict the earthquake damage degree of buildings based on field data. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2021. 41(2): p. 2717-2730.
[37] Fox, M., et al., Thermography methodologies for detecting energy related building defects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 40: p. 296-310.
[38] Gaspar, K., M. Casals, and M. Gangolells, Classifying system for façades and anomalies. Journal of performance of constructed facilities, 2016. 30(1): p. 04014187.
[39] Serralheiro, M.I., J. de Brito, and A. Silva, Methodology for service life prediction of architectural concrete facades. Construction and Building Materials, 2017. 133: p. 261-274.
[40] Januzaj, Y., E. Beqiri, and A. Luma, Determining the Optimal Number of Clusters using Silhouette Score as a Data Mining Technique. International Journal of Online & Biomedical Engineering, 2023. 19(4) .
[41] Davies, D.L. and D.W. Bouldin, A cluster separation measure. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 1979(2): p. 224-227.
[42] Jang, J.-S., ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, 1993. 23(3): p. 665-685

  • Receive Date 19 June 2024
  • Revise Date 19 August 2024
  • Accept Date 28 September 2024