Influence of Shear Damper Arrangement on Seismic Performance of Mid-Rise Steel Framed Buildings

Shirkhani, Amir; Elgammal, Ahmed; Ali, Yasmin

doi:10.61882/NMCE.2509.1101

Influence of Shear Damper Arrangement on Seismic Performance of Mid-Rise Steel Framed Buildings

Document Type : Research

Authors

Amir Shirkhani ¹

Ahmed Elgammal ²

Yasmin Ali ³

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Torbat-e Jam, Torbat-e Jam, Iran

² Department of Civil Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

³ Department of Civil Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China ; Department of Civil Engineering, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamasa 11152, Egypt

10.61882/NMCE.2509.1101

Abstract

Strategic damper placement is critical for optimizing the seismic performance of steel buildings, yet the optimal arrangement for eccentrically braced frames (EBFs) remains a key research question. This study investigates this issue by evaluating the effectiveness of stainless-steel longitudinally stiffened vertical shear links (LVSLs). A ten-story steel frame was designed in four distinct configurations: a benchmark moment-resisting frame (MRF) and three EBFs with distinct LVSL arrangements, where the primary variations were concentrated in the lower stories. The seismic response of each configuration was assessed using nonlinear static pushover and dynamic time history analyses. The results demonstrate that all EBF configurations exhibit superior performance over the MRF in terms of lateral stiffness, strength, and ductility. A configuration that concentrated two smaller LVSLs in each of the first three stories displayed the most favorable response, yielding significant reductions in interstory drift and superior energy dissipation under both design-basis (DBE) and maximum considered earthquake (MCE) scenarios. While EBF systems require more structural steel than MRF systems, the proposed optimal configuration achieved this enhanced performance while utilizing the lowest total mass of stainless-steel dampers. This outcome demonstrates that for EBF systems, a concentrated damper arrangement tailored to the distribution of seismic demand provides a more resilient and materially efficient solution than generalized distributed placement strategies.‎

Keywords

Damper placement

Eccentrically Braced Frame (EBF)

Energy Dissipation

Stainless Steel

Shear Link

Subjects

Earthquake Engineering

[1] Li H, Qi Y, Kang T, Wang H. Study on Lateral-Load Resisting Mechanism and Capacities of Steel Frame Infilled with Composite Plate Shear Wall Under Cyclic Loading. Materials 2025;18:1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18071677.

[2] Nurjannah SA, Rosidawani, Saloma, Hanafiah, Rafly M. Performance-based Analysis of Building Structures in Various Earthquake Zones. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2023;1244:012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1244/1/012019.

[3] Tartaglia R, D’Aniello M, Maddaloni G, Landolfo R. Seismic Performance of Moment-Resisting–Eccentrically Braced Dual Frame Equipped with Detachable Links. Applied Sciences 2024;14:4676. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114676.

[4] Popov EP. Seismic Steel Framing Systems for Tall Buildings. Eng J 1982;19:141–9. https://doi.org/10.62913/engj.v19i3.385.

[5] Arum C, Akinkunmi A. Comparison of Wind-Induced Displacement Characteristics of Buildings with Different Lateral Load Resisting Systems. ENG 2011;03:236–47. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2011.33028.

[6] Longo A, Montuori R, Piluso V. Moment frames – concentrically braced frames dual systems: analysis of different design criteria. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2016;12:122–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.996164.

[7] Hu S, Wang W, Qu B. Seismic economic losses in mid-rise steel buildings with conventional and emerging lateral force resisting systems. Engineering Structures 2020;204:110021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110021.

[8] Titirla MD. A State-of-the-Art Review of Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Steel Braces. Buildings 2023;13:851. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13040851.

[9] Elgammal A, El-Khoriby S, Seleemah A. Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Aluminium Shear Links and Eccentric Steel Chevron Braces. Arab J Sci Eng 2024;49:1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08908-8.

[10] Di Cesare A, Ponzo FC. Seismic Retrofit of Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings with Hysteretic Bracing Systems: Design Procedure and Behaviour Factor. Shock and Vibration 2017;2017:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2639361.

[11] Di Cesare A, Ponzo FC, Nigro D. Assessment of the performance of hysteretic energy dissipation bracing systems. Bull Earthquake Eng 2014;12:2777–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9623-z.

[12] Phocas MC, Sophocleous TL. Adaptable dual control systems. A comparative parametric analysis. Int J of Safety and Security Eng 2012;2:280–96. https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V2-N3-280-296.

[13] Elgammal A, Ali Y. A novel hysteretic restoring force model for shear link dampers: A machine learning approach. Structures 2024;70:107848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107848.

[14] Elgammal A, Hassanein MF, Seleemah A. Enhancing the cyclic performance of shear links using longitudinal stiffeners. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2023;211:108200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108200.

[15] Ghobarah A, Ramadan T. Seismic analysis of links of various lengths in eccentrically braced frames. Can J Civ Eng 1991;18:140–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/l91-016.

[16] Wen H, Mahmoud H. A New Approach to Predict Cyclic Response and Fracture of Shear Links and Eccentrically Braced Frames. Front Built Environ 2018;4:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2018.00011.

[17] Yao Z, Wang W, Fang C, Zhang Z. An experimental study on eccentrically braced beam-through steel frames with replaceable shear links. Engineering Structures 2020;206:110185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110185.

[18] Ashrafi A, Imanpour A. Seismic response of steel multi-tiered eccentrically braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2021;181:106600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106600.

[19] Aied Qissab Al-Janabi M, Topkaya C. Seismic performance of eccentrically braced frames designed to AISC341 and EC8 specifications. Structures 2021;29:339–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.031.

[20] Miao F, Nejati F, Zubair SAM, Yassin ME. Seismic Performance of Eccentrical Braced Frame Retrofitted by Box Damper in Vertical Links. Buildings 2022;12:1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101506.

[21] Rai DC, Wallace BJ. Aluminium shear-links for enhanced seismic resistance. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 1998;27:315–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199804)27:4<315::AID-EQE703>3.0.CO;2-N.

[22] Shayanfar MA, Barkhordari MA, Rezaeian AR. Experimental study of cyclic behavior of composite vertical shear link in eccentrically braced frames. Steel and Composite Structures 2012;12:13–29. https://doi.org/10.12989/SCS.2012.12.1.013.

[23] Hu S, Liu S, Xu H, Zeng S, Zhang B, Yu Y. Experimental investigation of an innovative very short shear link with shear slotted bolted connection in eccentrically braced frames. Structures 2024;66:106890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106890.

[24] Huangfu S-E, Tao Z, Zhang Y, Yuan Z, Li H, Zhang Z. Web tension field action of a stainless steel section with stiffened web and folded flanges under bending and shear interaction. Sci Rep 2025;15:5146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89314-4.

[25] Huangfu S-E, Tao Z, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Zhang J. Numerical Study on the Shear Behavior of a Late-Model Cold-Formed Stainless Steel C-Shaped Beam. Materials 2024;18:91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010091.

[26] Elgammal A, Ali Y. Optimizing stiffener orientation in cold-formed shear panel dampers for enhanced ductility and energy dissipation. Asian J Civ Eng 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-025-01398-5.

[27] Lázaro L, Chacón R. Material behaviour of austenitic stainless steel subjected to cyclic and arbitrary loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2022;189:107113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107113.

[28] Duan H, Cao M, Liu L, Yue S, He H, Zhao Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y. Prediction of 316 stainless steel low-cycle fatigue life based on machine learning. Sci Rep 2023;13:6753. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33354-1.

[29] Duan H, Yue S, Liu Y, He H, Zhang Z, Zhao Y. A deep learning-based method for predicting the low-cycle fatigue life of austenitic stainless steel. Mater Res Express 2023;10:086506. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aced39.

[30] Bao S, Feng H, Song Z, He J, Wu X, Gu Y. Study on the Deformation Behavior of Two Phases during the Low Cycle Fatigue of UNS S32750 Duplex Stainless Steel. Materials 2024;17:3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143390.

[31] Zheng S, Zhou F, Cheng J, Li H-T, Rong R. Experimental study on cyclic hardening characteristics of structural stainless steels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2022;191:107196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107196.

[32] Pate SB, Dundulis G, Griskevicius P. Modeling of LCF Behaviour on AISI316L Steel Applying the Armstrong–Frederick Kinematic Hardening Model. Materials 2024;17:3395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17143395.

[33] Hu Y, Tang S, Liu Y, Li L, Wang C, Wang Q. The Gradient Effect on Cyclic Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel in the Ultrasonic Bending Test. Materials 2024;17:1657. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071657.

[34] Hwang B, Kim T, Ahn Y. Experimental investigation of structural behavior of 316L stainless steel and carbon steel slit dampers. Thin-Walled Structures 2023;186:110704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2023.110704.

[35] Zhao J, Luo J, Zhang X, Ruan X, Sun Y. Experimental study on seismic behavior of concrete walls with external magnetorheological dampers. Smart Mater Struct 2023;32:065005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/accd31.

[36] Ramanjaneyulu B, Prasad A, Satish K, Keertan TS, Bommisetty J. Seismic analysis of vertically irregular RCC high-rise buildings: A study with provision of FVD at various locations. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2024;1409:012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1409/1/012034.

[37] Kurucu MC, Atam E, Güzelkaya M, Eksin İ. Intelligent Computational Methods for Optimal Distribution of Friction Dampers in Seismic Protection of Buildings. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell 2024;8:3055–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2024.3369909.

[38] Dong S, Pan W, Ye L, Wang J. Design of displacement-based viscous damper damping structures. Sci Rep 2025;15:11742. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94016-y.

[39] Javaid K, Verma N. Vibration control of seismic forces using viscous dampers and buckling restrained braces in irregular composite buildings. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2023;1110:012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1110/1/012052.

[40] European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures-Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings 2005.

[41] European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings 2004.

[42] Elgammal A. Improving the Performance of Vertical Shear Links for Enhanced Seismic Energy Dissipation. MSc Thesis. Tanta University, 2021.

[43] Computers and Structures, Inc. ETABS Ultimate 20.0.0 2021.

[44] American Society of Civil Engineeris (ASCE). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings 2017.

[45] Selemah A, El-Khoriby S, El-Gammal A. Seismic Response of 2-D Plane Framed Buildings Eccentrically Braced with Vertical Shear Links. International Journal of Advances in Structural and Geotechnical Engineering 2022;03:1–18. https://doi.org/10.21608/asge.2022.152698.1006.

[46] Maniyar SU, Paul DK. Enhancement of Seismic Performance Using Shear Link Braces in a Building Designed Only for Gravity Loads. J Inst Eng India Ser A 2012;93:27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-012-0005-8.

[47] Lian M, Su M. Seismic performance of high-strength steel fabricated eccentrically braced frame with vertical shear link. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2017;137:262–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.06.022.

[48] ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS 2023.

[49] Wen Y-K. Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems. J Engrg Mech Div 1976;102:249–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0002106.

[50] Seismosoft Ltd. SeismoMatch 2025 2025.

[51] Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer∗ JJ, Markatis A, McCOYH E, Mendis R. An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2006;10:67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350629.