Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering

Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering

Evaluation and comparison of semi-empirical and numerical methods in predicting wave characteristics in the South Caspian Sea

Document Type : Case Study

Authors
1 MSc student, School of Civil Engineering, faculty of engineering, University of Tehran
2 School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Persian Gulf University
3 Associate Professor, School of Civil Engineering, faculty of engineering, University of Tehran
Abstract
The prediction of wave parameters based on measured wind parameters plays a crucial role in Coastal and Ocean Engineering. This is particularly important in designing coastal and offshore structures, as there may be limited availability of wave measurement stations. In such cases, wave prediction methods can be used as an alternative to estimate wave characteristics during the design phase of various inshore and offshore structures.This research compares the prediction of wave characteristics between different semi-empirical methods and the MIKE21-SW model. For this aim, the measurements of the wave recorder buoy of the Caspian Oil Company used for wind data as well as wave characteristics. Statistical indices indicate that the SPM method is the most applicable method than other Semi-empirical methods for predicting the wave characteristics. The error of the semi-empirical method is about twice than the numerical method. There is more correlation between the obtained and measured data in the numerical method compared to the semi-empirical methods.
Keywords

Subjects


[1] Bishop, C. T. (1983). Comparison of manual wave prediction models. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 109(1), 1-17.
[2] Kazeminezhad, M.H., Etemad-Shahidi, A., Mousavi, S.J. (2004), “Application of Simplified Methods in the Prediction of Wave Parameters in Neka”, 6th International Conference on Coastal, Ports & Marine Structures.
[3] Kazeminezhad, M.H, Etemad-Shahidi, A., Mousavi, S.J. (2005), “Application of Fuzzy Inference System in the Prediction of Wave Parameters”, J. Ocean Engineering, 32 (2005) pp 1709–1725.
[4] Siregar, G. R. S., Alfarizi, H., Purnomo, F. M., Ginanjar, S., & Wirasatriya, A. (2020). Validation of Wave Forecasting with the Sverdrup, Munk, and Bretschneider (SMB) Method Using Easywave Algorithm. In 2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Geoscience, Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (AGERS) (pp. 11-15). IEEE.
[5] Juliani, V., & Adytia, D. (2020). Wave Height Prediction based on Wind Information by using General Regression Neural Network, study case in Jakarta Bay. In 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[6] Asma, S., Sezer, A., & Ozdemir, O. (2012). MLR and ANN models of significant wave height on the west coast of India. Computers & Geosciences, 49, 231-237.
[7] Salah, H. (2017). Evaluate the Prediction of Wave Parameters Using Parametric Methods in the South Coast of the Mediterranean Sea.
[8] Emrecan, P. (2022). A computational tool for wind wave prediction based on CEM method (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University).
[9] Wu, M., Stefanakos, C., Gao, Z., & Haver, S. (2019). Prediction of short-term wind and wave conditions for marine operations using a multi-step-ahead decomposition-ANFIS model and quantification of its uncertainty. Ocean Engineering, 188, 106300.
[10] Choi, B. Y., Jo, H. J., Lee, K. H., & Byoun, D. H. (2018). Development of Wind Induced Wave Predict Using Revisited Methods. Journal of Advanced Research in Ocean Engineering, 4(3), 124-134.
[11] Suursaar, Ü. (2013). Locally calibrated wave hindcasts in the Estonian coastal sea in 1966-2011. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 62(1), 42.
[12] Kamranzad, B., Etemad-Shahidi, A., & Kazeminezhad, M. H. (2011). Wave height forecasting in Dayyer, the Persian Gulf. Ocean engineering, 38(1), 248-255.
[13] abbasi, M. R. (2019). Evaluating semi-empirical wave forecasting method CEM in the Strait of Hormuz. International Journal of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, 3(3), 43–46.
[14] DHI, 2016. MIKE11, MIKE21FM, MIKESW, User Manual.
[15] Remya, P. G., Kumar, R., Basu, S., & Sarkar, A. (2012). Wave hindcast experiments in the Indian Ocean using MIKE 21 SW model. Journal of earth system science, 121, 385-392.
[16] Noujas, V., Thomas, K. V., & Ajeesh, N. R. (2017). Shoreline management plan for a protected but eroding coast along the southwest coast of India. International Journal of Sediment Research, 32(4), 495-505.
[17] Heidarian, P., Neyshabouri, S. A. A. S., Khoshkonesh, A., Bahmanpouri, F., Nsom, B., & Eidi, A. (2022). Numerical study of flow characteristics and energy dissipation over the slotted roller bucket system. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(4), 5337–5351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01372-z
[18] Khoshkonesh, A., Nsom, B., Okhravi, S., Ahmadi Dehrashid, F., Heidarian, P., & DiFrancesco, S. (2024). Numerical investigation of dam break flow over erodible beds with diverse substrate level variations. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 72(1), March 2024. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2023-0040
[19] Khoshkonesh, A., Nsom, B., Dehrashid, F. A., Heidarian, P., & Riaz, K. (2021, January). Comparison of the SWE and 3D models in simulation of the dam-break flow over the mobile bed. In Fifth scientific Conference of applied research in science and technology of Iran.
[20] Khoshkonesh, A., Asim, T., Mishra, R., Dehrashid, F. A., Heidarian, P., & Nsom, B. (2022). Study the effect of obstacle arrangements on the dam-break flow. International Journal of COMADEM, 25(1), 41-50. https://apscience.org/comadem/index.php/comadem/article/view/301
[21] Bonomelli, R., Pilotti, M., & Heidarian, P. (2024). DEBRA: A multi-rheological 2D steep shallow water finite volume scheme for debris flow propagation in mountain areas. EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 April 2024. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-4141
[22] Benetti, M., Heidarian, P., Bonomelli, R., & Pilotti, M. (2024). Exploring remote sensing methodologies for river bed grain size: Insights from a mountainous watershed study in Val Camonica, Italy. EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 April 2024. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-5752
[23] Khoshkonesh, A., Dehrashid, F. A., Nsom, B., Gohari, S., Banejad, H., Heidarian, P. (2021). Dam-break flow regime over mobile beds, a numerical CFD approach. Seminar: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN CONSTRUCTION. https://www.sid.ir/paper/949571/en
[24] Khoshkonesh, A., Dehrashid, F. A., Nsom, B., Gohari, S., Banejad, H., Heidarian, P. (2021). Dam-break induced flow over mobile beds, numerical approach in volume of fluid method. Seminar: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN CONSTRUCTION. https://www.sid.ir/paper/949571/en
[25] Khoshkonesh, A., Dehrashid, F. A., Nsom, B., Gohari, S., Banejad, H., Heidarian, P. (2021). Generation the hydraulic jumps by the dam-break flow over the movable beds. Seminar: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN CONSTRUCTION. https://www.sid.ir/paper/949571/en
[26] Zarrin, Z., Khajavigodellou, Y., & Zoej, M. J. V. (2024). Detection of Land Use Changes in Forests Using Satellite Image Classification Based on Deep Learning: A Case Study of Sardasht Forests. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 28(5), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2024/v28i5769
[27] Khajavigodellou, Y., Qi, J., Chen, J., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Moore, N. J., & Zarrin, Z. (2023). Reframing the WEF Nexus to Prevent WEF Bankruptcy: Transboundary River Basin Water-Energy-Food Bankruptcy Challenges and Potential Solutions. AGU23.
[28] Khajavigodellou, Y., Qi, J., Chen, J., Moore, N. J., Nejadhashemi, A. P., & Zarrin, Z. (2023). Transboundary Water Resource Conflicts: A New Cold War?. AGU23.
[29] Shore Protection Manual” (1984), U.S. Army Coastal Engineer Waterways Station, Vicksburg, MS, 2 Volumes, 4th Edition.
[30] “Shore Protection Manual” (1977), U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center, Fort Belvoir, VA, 3 Volumes, 3rd Edition.
[31] Coastal Engineering Manual” (2003), Chapter II-2: “Meteorology and Wave Climate”, Engineer Manual 1110-2-1100, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC.
[32] Shore Protection Manual or Lecture Notes Holthuijsen (Ocean Wave Theory, P16-19) Calculation acc. To Bretschneider; see SPM or Lecture Notes of Holthuijsen.
[33] Wilson, B.W., 1965. Numerical prediction of ocean waves in the North Atlantic for December 1959. Deutsche Hydrogen. Z, 18(3):114–30.
[34] U.S. Army Coastal Engineering Research Center, Shore Protection Manual, 4th Edition, U.S, Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 120-130, 1984.
[35] Souri, J., OmidvarMohammadi, H., Neyshabouri, S.A.A.S., Chooplou, A.C, Kahrizi, E, & Akbari, H. (2024). Numerical simulation of aeration impact on the performance of a-type rectangular and trapezoidal piano key weirs. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-024-02058-4
[36] Kahrizi, E. (2024). Application of the Image Processing Method and the Beer-Lambert Law for Assessing Sea Water Intrusion in Rivers. EarthArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31223/X50D8K
[37] Motaei, S., Ghazavi, M., & Rezazadeh, G. (2024). Incorporating temperature-dependent properties into the modeling of photo-thermo-mechanical interactions in cancer tissues. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 47, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.102351
[38] Kahrizi, E., Salehi Neyshabouri, S. A. A., Zeynolabedin, A., Souri, J., & Akbari, H. (2023). Experimental evaluation of two-layer air bubble curtains to prevent seawater intrusion into rivers. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 14(2), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.384
[39] Golshani, A., Taebi, S., & Chegini, V. (2007). Wave hindcast and extreme value analysis for the southern part of the Caspian Sea. Coastal engineering journal, 49(04), 443-459.
Volume 9, Issue 3
Winter 2025
Pages 28-38

  • Receive Date 20 July 2024
  • Revise Date 31 March 2025
  • Accept Date 22 February 2025