Finding the design collapse capacity of a multi-story RC frame in near-fault based on the collapse risk by using the ratio method

Shanehsazzadeh, Homa; Tehranizadeh, Mohsen; Haj Najafi, Leila

doi:10.61186/nmce.2022.447

Finding the design collapse capacity of a multi-story RC frame in near-fault based on the collapse risk by using the ratio method

Document Type : Research

Authors

¹ Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

² Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

³ Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Tehran South Branch, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tehran, Iran.

10.61186/nmce.2022.447

Abstract

The collapse risk role has increasingly drawn engineers’ attention in the performance-based design field and engineers tend to design the structures in a way to be qualified enough to resist earthquakes, especially at near-fault sites. Due to specific characteristics of near-fault records, structures in near-fault required more collapse capacity in comparison with far-fault sites. Furthermore, it is necessary to determine the collapse capacity that structures should be designed to comply with standards and to meet the collapse risk limit in the given site. In this research, the ratio method is presented to determine the design collapse capacity of structures based on the risk value of 1% in 50 years as well as the site hazard stemming from the integration scenario for near-fault. In this method, the structure behavior and fundamental period are incorporated, and effect of pulse period is considered as well. This method utilizes the ratio of the collapse capacity of the structure in near-fault to that of far-fault named γ. Consequently, efficient procedures based on nonlinear static pushover are used for obtaining the collapse capacity in far-fault and near-fault. Then, the ratio method is employed on a mid-rise RC frame and the design collapse capacities are acquired for two amounts of Tp/T. The result shows ratio method can be used for any Tp/T values especially those corresponding to the governing Tp at site. Moreover, the least value of γ can be used conservatively since the design collapse capacity of the structure in near-fault is raised by reducing γ.

Keywords

20.1001.1.23454296.2023.7.4.7.1

References

[1] Ellingwood, B.R. and Wen, Y.-K. (2005), Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low probability-high consequence earthquake events in Mid-America. Prog. Struct. Engng Mater., 7: 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.191 https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.191

[2] Judd, J. and Charney, F. (2014). Earthquake risk analysis of structures in structural dynamics, EURODYN 2014, A. Cunha, et al., Editors, Porto, Portugal, pp. 2929- 2938

[3] Luco, N., Ellingwood, B.R., Hamburger, R.O., Hooper, J.D. Kimball, J.K. and Kircher, C.A. (2007), Risk-Targeted versus Current Seismic Design Maps for the Conterminous United States.

[4] ASCE- Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (2016), ASCE-SEI 7- 16, American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, Virginia.

[5] Applied Technology Council, Quantification of building seismic performance factors (2009) (FEMA P695), NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Design of New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA P-695, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C.

[6] Baker, J.W. (2007). Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97(5), pp. 1486-1501 https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255

[7] Baker, J.W. and Cornell, C.A. (2008). Vector-valued intensity measures for pulse-like near-fault ground motions", Engineering Structures, 30(4), pp. 1048-1057 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.009

[8] Tehranizadeh, M. and Shanehsazzadeh, H. (2011). Nearfault amplification factor by using wavelet method", Research, Development and Practice in Structural Engineering and Construction. DOI: 10.3850/978- 981-08-7920-4 St-35-0117

[9] Tehranizadeh, M. and Shanehsazzadeh, H. (April 2011). Directivity effects on near-fault amplification factor", Urban Earthquake Engineering, Sharif university. https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-08-7920-4_St-35-0117

[10] C. Champion and A. Liel, "The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk," EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, vol. 41, p. 1391-1409, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1188

[11] D. Vamvatsikos and C. Cornell, "Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multiple-degree of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation," Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 131, p. 589-599, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(589)

[12] G. Baltzopoulos, C. Chioccarelli and I. Iervolino, "The displacement coefficient method in near-source conditions," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 44(7), p. 1015-1033, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2497

[13] G. Baltzopoulos, R. Baraschino, I. Iervolino and D. Vamvatsikos, "SPO2FRAG: software for seismic fragility assessment," Bull Earthquake Eng, vol. 15, p. 4399-4425, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0145-3

[14] G. Baltzopoulos, D. Vamvatsikos and I. Iervolino, "Analytical modeling of near-source pulse-like seismic demand for multi-linear backbone oscillators," EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7712/120115.3476.704

[15] D. Vamvatsikos and C. Cornell, "Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multiple-degree of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation," Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 131, p. 589-599, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(589)

[16] Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, Institute., American Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019.

[17] Yousefi, M. and Taghikhany, T. (2014). Incorporation of directivity effect in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and disaggregation of Tabriz city", Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1096-5

[18] "Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings", Standard No. 2800, 4th edition (2014)

[19] Shahi, S.K. and Baker, J.W. (2014). An efficient algorithm to identify strong velocity pulses in multi-component ground motions", Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 104(5), pp. 2456-2466 https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130191

[20] M. Kohrangi, M., Bazzurro, P., Vamvatsikos, D., (2021) Seismic risk and loss estimation for the building stock in Isfahan: part II-hazard analysis and risk assessment. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 19, 1739-1763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01037-1

[21] Haselton, C.B., Liel, A., Deierlein, G.G., Dean, B.S., and Chou, J.H. (2010). Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile moment frames", Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(4), pp. 481-491 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318

[22] Liel, A., Haselton, C.B., and Deierlein, G. (2010). Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. II: Comparative assessment of nonductile frames", Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(4), pp. 492-502 and ductile moment https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000275

[23] Champion, C. and Liel, A. (2012). The effect of near-fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 41(10), pp. 1391- 1409 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1188

[24] C. Haselton and G. Deierlein, "Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings," Blume Center Technical Report, vol. 156, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/40944(249)22

[25] F. Mckenna, "OpenSees: A Framework for Earthquake Engineering Simulation," vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 58-66, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66

[26] "Seismic performance assessment of buildings" Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington, DC, 2012.

[27] L. Ibarra, R. Medina and H. Krawinkler, "Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration," Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 34, p. 1489-1511, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495

[28] M. B. Shoraka, T. Y. Yang and K. J. Elwood, "Seismic loss estimation of non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings," Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 297-310, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2213

[29] L. F. Ibarra and H. Krawinkler, "Global Collapse oF Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations," Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University, 2005.

[30] Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE/SEI 41-17, 2017.

[31] C. B. Haselton, A. Liel, S. Taylor-Lange and G. Deierlein, "Calibration of Model to Simulate Response of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Columns to Collapse," ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, pp. 1141-1152, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689245

[32] C. B. Haselton, A. Liel, S. Lange and G. Deierlein, "Beam-Column Element Model Calibrated for Predicting Flexural Response Leading to Global Collapse of RC Frame Buildings," PEER report, 2007.

[33] Lazar, N., and Dolšek, M., (2014). A closed form solution for seismic risk assessment incorporating intensity bounds", Engineering Structures, Elsevier, Vol78, pp. 78-79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.011

[34] Liel, A., Luco, N., Raghunandan, M., Champion, C., (2015). Modifications to risk-targeted seismic design maps for subduction and near-fault hazards. International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12, Vancouver, Canada, July 12-15.

Finding the design collapse capacity of a multi-story RC frame in near-fault based on the collapse risk by using the ratio method

References

Volume 7, Issue 4
June 2023
Pages 89-100

Files

History

Share

How to cite

Statistics

Finding the design collapse capacity of a multi-story RC frame in near-fault based on the collapse risk by using the ratio method

References

Volume 7, Issue 4June 2023Pages 89-100

Files

History

Share

How to cite

Statistics

Volume 7, Issue 4
June 2023
Pages 89-100