Numerical study of soil-structure interaction effects on the natural frequency of offshore wind turbines

Eslami, Amin; Ghorbani, Ali

doi:10.61186/NMCE.804.1

Numerical study of soil-structure interaction effects on the natural frequency of offshore wind turbines

Document Type : Research

Authors

Amin Eslami ¹

Ali Ghorbani ²

¹ PhD candidate of Civil Eng., University of Guilan. Guilan, Iran

² Associated professor of Civil Eng., University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran

10.61186/NMCE.804.1

Abstract

Offshore wind turbines (OWT) are considered as one the most promising ways of harvesting green energies in the world. OWTs are dynamically sensitive as their loading frequency is close to their natural frequency, allowing a narrow band of frequency to avoid resonance. Therefore, precise estimation of their natural frequency (fn) can be crucial. Soil-structure interactions (SSI) can be of great importance in estimation of dynamic characteristics of OWTs. In this study, a standard offshore wind turbine is modeled using FLAC-3D in two cases of fixed-base, i.e. with no SSI and another case with full system of soil and structural parts to estimate the effects of SSI on the natural frequency of the OWT systems. The result showed that modeling the OWT in the fixed base state results in overestimation of the system’s natural frequency for 20 percent which can be misleading in the design process. Besides, the damping ratio was largely underestimated in the fixed base condition due to the main contribution of soil damping. Therefore, the importance of soil-structure interactions was emphasized in modeling and design of offshore wind turbines.

Keywords

Offshore wind turbine (OWT)

Natural frequency (fn)

Fixed base condition

Soil-structure interaction (SSI)

[1] Wang X, Zeng X, Li J, Yang X, Wang H. A review on recent advancements of substructures for offshore wind turbines. Energy conversion and management. 2018;158(103-19.

[2] Kaynia AM. Seismic considerations in design of offshore wind turbines. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2019;124(399-407.

[3] DNV. Design of offshore wind turbine structures. DET NORSKE VERITAS. 2014;DNV-OS-J101(

[4] GL. Guidline for the certification of wind turbines. Germanischer Lloyd, 2010.

[5] Bhattacharya S. Challenges in design of foundations for offshore wind turbines. Engineering & Technology Reference. 2014;1(1):922.

[6] Bhattacharya S, Biswal S, Aleem M, Amani S, Prabhakaran A, Prakhya G, et al. Seismic Design of Offshore Wind Turbines: Good, Bad and Unknowns. Energies. 2021;14(12):3496.

[7] Bhattacharya S, Cox JA, Lombardi D, Muir Wood D. Dynamics of offshore wind turbines supported on two foundations. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering. 2013;166(2):159-69.

[8] Adhikari S, Bhattacharya S. Vibrations of wind-turbines considering soil-structure interaction. Wind and Structures. 2011;14(2):85.

[9] AlHamaydeh M, Hussain S. Optimized frequency-based foundation design for wind turbine towers utilizing soil–structure interaction. Journal of the Franklin Institute. 2011;348(7):1470-87.

[10] Bhattacharya S, Adhikari S. Experimental validation of soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2011;31(5-6):805-16.

[11] Kjørlaug RA, Kaynia AM. Vertical earthquake response of megawatt‐sized wind turbine with soil‐structure interaction effects. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2015;44(13):2341-58.

[12] Lombardi D, Bhattacharya S, Wood DM. Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2013;49(165-80.

[13] Shi W, Park HC, Chung CW, Shin HK, Kim SH, Lee SS, et al. Soil-structure interaction on the response of jacket-type offshore wind turbine. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. 2015;2(2):139-48.

[14] Seong JT, Ha JG, Kim JH, Park HJ, Kim DS. Centrifuge modeling to evaluate natural frequency and seismic behavior of offshore wind turbine considering SFSI. Wind energy. 2017;20(10):1787-800.

[15] Liu H. Constitutive modelling of cyclic sand behaviour for offshore foundations: Delft University of Technology, 2020.

[16] Bhattacharya S, Nikitas N, Garnsey J, Alexander N, Cox J, Lombardi D, et al. Observed dynamic soil–structure interaction in scale testing of offshore wind turbine foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2013;54(47-60.

[17] Jonkman J, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States), 2009.

[18] Esfeh PK, Kaynia AM. Numerical modeling of liquefaction and its impact on anchor piles for floating offshore structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2019;127(105839.

[19] Esfeh PK, Kaynia AM. Earthquake response of monopiles and caissons for Offshore Wind Turbines founded in liquefiable soil. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2020;136(106213.

[20] Đilas LD. Estimation of Soil Damping Contribution on Offshore Monopiles Using Plaxis 3D Approach: M.Sc. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherland, 2018.

[21] Malekjafarian A, Jalilvand S, Doherty P, Igoe D. Foundation damping for monopile supported offshore wind turbines: A review. Marine Structures. 2021;77(102937.

[22] Dafalias YF, Manzari MT. Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects. Journal of Engineering mechanics. 2004;130(6):622-34.

[23] Barrero AR, Taiebat M, Dafalias YF. Modeling cyclic shearing of sands in the semifluidized state. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics. 2020;44(3):371-88.

[24] Dafalias YF, Taiebat M. SANISAND-Z: zero elastic range sand plasticity model. Géotechnique. 2016;66(12):999-1013.

[25] Liu H, Diambra A, Abell JA, Pisanò F. Memory-enhanced plasticity modeling of sand behavior under undrained cyclic loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2020;146(11):04020122.

[26] Taiebat M, Dafalias YF. SANISAND: Simple anisotropic sand plasticity model. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics. 2008;32(8):915-48.

[27] Taiebat M, Jeremić B, Dafalias YF, Kaynia AM, Cheng Z. Propagation of seismic waves through liquefied soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2010;30(4):236-57.

[28] Yang M, Taiebat M, Dafalias Y. SANISAND-MSf: a memory surface and semifluidized state enhanced sand plasticity model for undrained cyclic shearing. Géotechnique. 2020;72(3):227-46.

[29] Eslami A, Ghorbani A. Seismic response of offshore wind turbines supported on Monopiles and Suction Buckets: Numerical modelling and soft computing study. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2022;159(107284.

[30] Itasca. FLAC, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua. USER’S GUIDE. 2015