1. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California (ATC 13). Applied Technology Council; 1985.
2. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology, earthquake model, HAZUS-MH MR4 technical manual. 2003.
3. Cavalieri F, Correia AA, Crowley H, Pinho R. Seismic fragility analysis of URM buildings founded on piles: influence of dynamic soil-structure interaction models. Bull Earthq Eng 2020;18:4127-56. [
DOI:10.1007/s10518-020-00853-9]
4. Salami MR, Kashani MM, Goda K. Influence of advanced structural modeling technique, mainshock-aftershock sequences, and ground-motion types on seismic fragility of low-rise RC structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2019;117:263-79. [
DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.036]
6. Ellingwood BR, Celik OC, Kinali K. Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid‐America. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2007;36:1935-52. [
DOI:10.1002/eqe.693]
7. Cavalieri F, Correia AA, Crowley H, Pinho R. Dynamic soil-structure interaction models for fragility characterisation of buildings with shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2020;132:106004. [
DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.106004]
8. Sáez E, Lopez-Caballero F, Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi A. Effect of the inelastic dynamic soil-structure interaction on the seismic vulnerability assessment. Struct Saf 2011;33:51-63. [
DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.05.004]
9. Japan International Cooperation Agency. The study on seismic microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Pacific Consult Int Report, OYO Coop Japan 2000:291-390.
10. Mansouri B, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Amini-Hosseini K, Nourjou R, Mousavi M. Building seismic loss model for Tehran. Earthq Spectra 2010;26:153-68. [
DOI:10.1193/1.3280377]
11. American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE 7) 2010.
12. American Institute of Steel Construction. Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360). 2010.
13. McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Univ California, Berkeley, CA 2000. http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
14. Ibarra LF, Krawinkler H. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Berkeley, CA; 2005.
15. Lignos DG, Krawinkler H. Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading. J Struct Eng 2011;137:1291-302. [
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376]
16. Gajan S, Raychowdhury P, Hutchinson TC, Kutter BL, Stewart JP. Application and validation of practical tools for nonlinear soil-foundation interaction analysis. Earthq Spectra 2010;26:111-29. [
DOI:10.1193/1.3263242]
17. Harden CW, Hutchinson TC. Beam-on-nonlinear-Winkler-foundation modeling of shallow, rocking-dominated footings. Earthq Spectra 2009;25:277-300. [
DOI:10.1193/1.3110482]
18. Harden CW. Numerical modeling of the nonlinear cyclic response of shallow foundations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; 2005.
19. Raychowdhury P, Hutchinson T. Nonlinear material models for Winkler-based shallow foundation response evaluation. GeoCongress 2008 Charact. Monit. Model. GeoSystems, 2008, p. 686-93. [
DOI:10.1061/40972(311)85]
20. Gajan S, Hutchinson TC, Kutter BL, Raychowdhury P, Ugalde JA, Stewart JP. Numerical models for analysis and performance-based design of shallow foundations subjected to seismic loading. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Berkeley; 2008.
21. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Quantification of building seismic performance factors (FEMA P695). Applied Technology Council; 2009.
22. Baker JW. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2007;97:1486-501. [
DOI:10.1785/0120060255]
23. Road, Housing, and Urban Development Research Center. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. 2014.
24. Al-Mashaykhi M, Rajeev P, Wijesundara KK, Hashemi MJ. Displacement profile for displacement based seismic design of concentric braced frames. J Constr Steel Res 2019;155:233-48. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.12.029]
25. Shoeibi S, Kafi MA, Gholhaki M. New performance-based seismic design method for structures with structural fuse system. Eng Struct 2017;132:745-60. [
DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.002]
26. Ghosh S, Datta D, Katakdhond AA. Estimation of the Park-Ang damage index for planar multi-storey frames using equivalent single-degree systems. Eng Struct 2011;33:2509-24. [
DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.023]
27. Park Y-J, Ang AHS, Wen YK. Damage-limiting aseismic design of buildings. Earthq Spectra 1987;3:1-26. [
DOI:10.1193/1.1585416]
30. Applied Technology Council. Seismic performance assessment of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2012.
31. Zareian F, Krawinkler H. Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2007;36:1901-14. [
DOI:10.1002/eqe.702]
32. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002;31:491-514. [
DOI:10.1002/eqe.141]
33. Harati M, Mashayekhi M, Barmchi MA, Estekanchi H. Influence of Ground Motion Duration on the Structural Response at Multiple Seismic Intensity Levels. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering Journal 2019; 3(4):10-23. [
DOI:10.29252/nmce.3.4.10]