Volume 3, Issue 2 (12-2018)                   NMCE 2018, 3(2): 47-56 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezaie F, Hossieny Akhgar Y. Evaluation of Wind Effects on Super-Tall Buildings using CFD Simulation and 3D Visualization. NMCE 2018; 3 (2) :47-56
URL: http://nmce.kntu.ac.ir/article-1-199-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Bu-Ali Sinai University of Hamedan, Iran.
2- Msc Omran-Tosseeh, college of Engineering, Hamedan. , yakhgar57@gmail.com
Abstract:   (881 Views)
In super-tall buildings, the impacts of wind loads are of more importance than earthquakes, and inevitably, the wind tunnel testing provides reliable results of the wind loads due to their high level of sensitivity and accuracy, although it burdens a high cost. In this paper, we have applied the ‘numerical methods’ in order to obtain the 2D and 3D drag coefficients. The CFD simulation was performed by the “ANSYS FLUENT” software. The results shown by the k-ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model within a fine mesh and by selection of the small time-step size and also increasing the number of iterations… , prove that the accuracy of the analysis is enhanced in which it is valid for the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) model as well. The Grid Convergence Index ( GCI ) is obtained using the uniform velocity and pressure coefficients within a reasonable range, which is maintained by an average mesh in order to minimize the spent time and the associated cost. Meanwhile, the pressure-correction gradient along the cell faces is more compatible with the results obtained by Kawamoto except one point. As the duration of winding increases, the negative (vacuum) pressure on the leeward side develops and the wake also moves farther. The results also show that the maximum wind pressure applied to the building using the SST method is larger than the one in the LES method, but the LES method has less variation in height. Moreover, the wind resisting behavior of super tall buildings is better represented by3D modeling and the results of the simulation are more accurate and realistic, according to the experimental results.
Full-Text [PDF 825 kb]   (620 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2018/08/6 | Revised: 2018/11/8 | Accepted: 2018/12/10 | ePublished ahead of print: 2018/12/22

1. [1] Awrejcewicz, J., "Numerical analysis theory and application", 2011, ISBN 978-953-307-389-7
2. [2] Koliyabandara, S.M.N.H., Jayasundara, H.M.A.D., Wijesundara, K.K., "Evaluation of Different Turbulence Models in Determining Wind Loads on Tall Buildings", 2018.
3. [3] Casey, M., Wintergerste, T., "Quality and Trust in Industrial CFD", Best Practice Guidelines, editors, ERCOFTAC SIG ERCOFTAC, 2000.
4. [4] Franke, J., Hirsch, C., Jensen, A.G., Krüs. H.W., Schatzmann, M.,Westbury, P.S., Miles, S.D., Wisse, J.A., Wright, N.G., "Recommendations on the use of CFD in wind engineering", 2004.
5. [5] Castro, I.P., "CFD for external aerodynamics in the built environment", The QNET-CFD Network Newsletter, Vol. 2, 2003, 4-7.
6. [6] Schatzmann, M., Leitl, B., "Validation and application of obstacle-resolving urban dispersion models", Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 36, 2002, 4811-4821. [DOI:10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00424-7]
7. [7] Westbury, P.S., Miles, S., Stathopoulos, T., "CFD application on the evaluation of pedestrian-level winds", in G.Augusti, C. Borri, and C. Sacré, editors, Impact of Wind and Storm on City life and Built Environment, 2002, pages 172-181, CSTB, Nantes.
8. [8] Stathopoulos, T., "The numerical wind tunnel for industrial aerodynamics: Real or virtual in the new millenium?", Wind & Structures, Vol. 5, 2002, 193-208. [DOI:10.12989/was.2002.5.2_3_4.193]
9. [9] Murakami, S., "Computational wind engineering", Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1990, 36 (Part 1), 517-538. [DOI:10.1016/0167-6105(90)90335-A]
10. [10] Huang, Sh., Li, QS., Xu, Sh., "Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall steel building by CFD", Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007, 63 (5), 612-627. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.033]
11. [11] Menter, F., "Two-equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Model for Engineering Applications", AIAA, 1994, Vol. 32(8), 1598-1605. [DOI:10.2514/3.12149]
12. [12] Nielsen, P., "Berechnung der Luftbewegung in Einem Zwangsbelufteten Raum", Gesundheits-Ingenieur, 1973, 299-302.
13. [13] Blocken, B., "LES over RANS in Building Simulation for Outdoor and Indoor Applications: A Foregone Conclusion?", Building Simulation, 2018, 821-870. [DOI:10.1007/s12273-018-0459-3]
14. [14] Yamada, T., Meroney, R.N., "Numerical and Wind Tunnel Simulation of Airflow Over an Obstacle", In Proceedings of the National Conference on Atmospheric Waves, Salt Lake City: 1971.
15. [15] Jones, W., Launder, B., "The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence", Int. J. Heat Mass Transf, 1972, 301-314. [DOI:10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2]
16. [16] Assaad, B., "Wind effect on super tall buildings using computational fluid dynamics and structural dynamics", thesis submitted to the faculty of the college of engineering and computer science, Florida Atlantic university, Boca Raton, 2015, 124 pages.
17. [17] Saebi, H., "Numerical analysis of two-dimensional incompressible fluid flow on a simple finite element method by finite element method", Islamic Azad University of Mashhad, MSc in Mechanical Engineering Eenergy Transformation Tendency Faculty of Engineering, 2013.
18. [18] Nasa space place, "How do hurricanes form?", https:// spaceplace.nasa.gov/ hurricanes/en, 2016.
19. [19] Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M., Langtry, R., "Turbulence, heat and mass transfer", 2003, pp. 625-632.
20. [20] Goldberg, U., Batten, P.,"wall-distance-free version of the SST turbulence model", Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 9, 2015, 33-40. [DOI:10.1080/19942060.2015.1004791]
21. [21] ANSYS, Inc, 2014, Fluent - Theory Guide, Canonsburg, PA. [22] Moukalled, F., Mangani, L., Darwi, M., "Fluid mechanics and its applications", book series, FMIA, vol. 113, 2016.
22. [23] B. Celik, I, Ghia, U., J. Roache, P., Freitas, C., "Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications", mechanical and aerospace engineering department West Virginia university, Morgan town WV (USA), 2008.
23. [24] Roache, P.J., Ghia, K.N., White, F.M., "Editorial Policy Statement on Control of Numerical Accuracy", Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1986. [DOI:10.1115/1.3242537]
24. [25] Richardson, L.F., Gaunt, J. A., "The deferred approach to the Limit", philosophical transactions of the royal society of london, 1927, Series A, 226, pp. 299-361. [DOI:10.1098/rsta.1927.0008]
25. [26] Roache, P.J., "A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies", proceedings of quantification of uncertainty in computation fluid dynamics, 1993, 23-24.
26. [27] Eça, L., Hoekstra, M., Roache, P.J., "Verification of Calculations: an Overview of the lisbon workshop", AIAA Computational Fluid, Dynamics Conference, Toronto, 2005. [DOI:10.2514/6.2005-4728]
27. [28] Eça, L., Hoekstra, M., Roache P.J., "Verification of calculations: an overview of the 2nd lisbon workshop", AIAA Paper, 2007. [DOI:10.2514/6.2007-4089]
28. [29] Mat ALI, M.S., DOOLAN, C.J., Wheatley, V., "Grid convergence study for a two-dimensional simulation of flow around a square sylinder at a low Raynolds number", seventh international conference on CFD in the minerals and process industries CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 2009.
29. [30] Roache, P.J., "Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics", Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech, 1997, 123-60 [DOI:10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author