Volume 2, Issue 2 (12-2017)                   NMCE 2017, 2(2): 11-27 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kheyroddin A, Ezoddin A R. Study on the Effect of the Position of X-bracing Arrangement in the Steel Structures with a Triangular Plan. NMCE 2017; 2 (2) :11-27
URL: http://nmce.kntu.ac.ir/article-1-125-en.html
1- Professor, Civil Engineering Faculty, Semnan University and member of Center of Excellence for Engineering and Management of Civil Infrastructures, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Ph.D. Candidate, Civil Engineering Faculty, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran and lecturer, Department of Civil Engineering, Semnan Branch, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Semnan, Iran
Abstract:   (1313 Views)
In buildings with triangular plan, the center of mass and rigidity cannot geometrically match all possible directions of the earthquake. This will result in torsional moments in the stories causing the building to rotate around the center of rigidity. In this paper, via response spectrum analysis (RSA) and nonlinear static analysis, the seismic behavior of 5-, 10- and 15-story steel structures with a triangular plan is investigated by proposing 7 types of bracing arrangements in the plan. According to the analysis results, the most appropriate bracing arrangements in these seven proposed models in the triangular planes is the arrangement of braces in the middle of the triangle sides and continuous. This causes the center of mass to get closer to the center of rigidity, as a result of which, torsional moments and additional rotational displacements at the stories are decreased. The continuous braces reduces the lateral displacement of the structure about 38% and increases the displacement ductility ratio about 12%. Also, in structures whose braces cross each other at one point, the torsional strength of the system has been zeroed and in accordance with the ASCE7-16, they are considered to possess extreme torsional irregularity and the structures are therefore unstable
Full-Text [PDF 1565 kb]   (957 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2017/04/11 | Revised: 2017/07/5 | Accepted: 2017/10/8 | ePublished ahead of print: 2017/10/23

References
1. [1] Sadek AW, Tso WK. (1989), "Strength eccentricity concept for inelastic analysis of asymmetrical structures", Engineering Structure. 11: 189-194. [DOI:10.1016/0141-0296(89)90006-0]
2. [2] Paulay T. (2000), "Understanding torsional phenomena in ductile systems". Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. 33: 403-420.
3. [3] Paulay T. (1997), "Seismic torsional effects on ductile structural wall systems", Journal of earthquake engineering, 1 (4) 721-745. [DOI:10.1080/13632469708962385]
4. [4] Paulay T. (1998), "Torsional mechanism in ductile building systems", Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 27 (10) 1101-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199810)27:10<1101::AID-EQE773>3.0.CO;2-9 [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199810)27:103.0.CO;2-9]
5. [5] Myslimaj B. Tso WK. (2002), "A strength distribution criterion for minimizing torsional response of asymmetric wall-type systems", Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 31: 99-120. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.100]
6. [6] Humar J, Yavari S, Saatcioglu M. (2003), "Design for forces induced by seismic torsion", Canada journal civil engineering, Published on the NRC research 30. 10.1139/l02-029. [DOI:10.1139/l02-029]
7. [7] National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). (1995), Associate Committee on the national building code, National Research Council of Canada, Quebec.
8. [8] National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). (2005), "Associate Committee on the National Building Code", National Research Council of Canada, Quebec.
9. [9] Zalka KA. (2010), "Torsional analysis of multi-storey building structures under horizontal load". the structural design of tall and special buildings. DOI: 10.1002/tal.665. [DOI:10.1002/tal.665]
10. [10] Kim J, Hong S. (2011), "Progressive collapse performance of irregular buildings". The structural design of tall and special buildings 20: 721-734. [DOI:10.1002/tal.575]
11. [11] Ravikumar CM, Babu Narayan KS, Sujith BV, Venkat Reddy D. (2012), "Effect of Irregular Configurations on Seismic Vulnerability of RC Buildings". Journal of architectural research. 2(3) 20-26, DOI: 10.5923/j.arch.20120203.01. [DOI:10.5923/j.arch.20120203.01]
12. [12] Gokdemir H, Ozbasaran H, Dogan M, Unluoglu E, Albayrak U. (2013), "Effects of torsional irregularity to structures during earthquakes". Engineering Failure Analysis 35 713-717. [DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.028]
13. [13] Tarbali K, Shakeri K. (2014), "Story shear and torsional moment-based pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings using an adaptive capacity spectrum method". Engineering Structures, 79, 32-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.006]
14. [14] Georgoussis G. (2014), "Modified seismic analysis of multistory asymmetric elastic buildings and suggestions for minimizing the rotational response". Earthquakes and Structures, An International Journal, 7(1): 039-52. [DOI:10.12989/eas.2014.7.1.039]
15. [15] Georgoussisa G, Tsompanosa A, Makarios T. (2015), "Approximate seismic analysis of multi-story buildings with mass and stiffness irregularities". Procedia Engineering 125: 959 - 966. [DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.147]
16. [16] Bahmani P, van de Lindt J, and Dao T. (2014), "Displacement-based design of buildings with torsion: theory and verification", Journal of structural engineering. 10.1061/ (ASCE) ST.1943-541X.0000896.
17. [17] American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). (2016), "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures", ASCE ISEI 7-16.
18. [18] Kheyroddin A. Aramesh S. (2015), "Lateral Resisting Systems in Tall Buildings". Semnan University Press (In Persian).
19. [19] Han SW, Kim T, Kim DH, Baek SJ. (2017), "Seismic collapse performance of special moment steel frames with torsional irregularities". Engineering Structures 141, 482-494. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.045]
20. [20] ETABS 2013. Version 13.1.1(2013), Extended 3-D Analysis of Building Systems, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley.
21. [21] American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2016), "Load and resistance factor design specification for structural steel buildings". Chicago (IL).
22. [22] Shatarat NK, Symans MD, McLean DI, Cofer WF. (2007), Evaluation of displacement-Based Methods and Computer Software for Seismic Analysis of Highway Bridges, Engineering Structures. 30 1335- 1345. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.021]
23. [23] ASCE 41-13, American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013), "Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings", public comment draft, Reston, VA.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA