Volume 7, Issue 1 (9-2022)                   NMCE 2022, 7(1): 16-27 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Naderi A A, Bkhshinezhad S, Rezaei S. Probabilistic performance assessment of seismically excited buildings with semi-active fluid viscous dampers. NMCE. 2022; 7 (1) :16-27
URL: http://nmce.kntu.ac.ir/article-1-353-en.html
1- Professor Assistant, Mechanical Engineering Department, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran. , aa.naderi@modares.ac.ir
2- Ph.D., Faculty of Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
3- Ph.D., Faculty of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (313 Views)
This paper presents a procedure to assess the probabilistic performance of the semi-active fluid viscous dampers (SAFVDs) utilized in seismically excited buildings. Some efficient on-off semi-active control algorithms based on motion towards or away from equilibrium, sky-hook, and ground-hook have been considered to determine the variable damping in each time step. The probabilistic relationship between intensity measure (IM) and seismic demand of the building has been estimated based on cloud analysis. A linear regression analysis has been employed to calculate the probabilistic demand parameters. A three-story nonlinear shear-type building equipped with SAFVDs has been adopted for the numerical example. The building has been subjected to a set of 20 actual earthquke records with the probability of occurrence of 10% in 50 years for the site of interest. The probabilistic performance of the nonlinear building equipped with SAFVDs has been assessed in terms of demand and fragility curves. The results indicate the effectiveness of the SAFVD systems in mitigating the fragility and enhancing the safety of the building. Particularly, a fragility reduction of about 51% is achieved at the immediate occupancy (IO) performance level using the SAFVD system.
Full-Text [PDF 1036 kb]   (110 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2021/08/21 | Revised: 2022/05/8 | Accepted: 2022/05/11 | ePublished ahead of print: 2022/06/6

References
1. Shariati, A., Kamgar, R., & Rahgozar, R. (2020). Optimum Layout of Nonlinear Fluid Viscous Damper for Improvement the Responses of Tall Buildings. Optimization in Civil Engineering, 10(3), 411- 431.‎
2. Hashemi, M. R., Vahdani, R., Gerami, M., & Kheyrodin, A. (2020). Viscous Damper Placement Optimization in Concrete Structures Using Colliding Bodies Algorithm and Story Damage Index. Optimization in Civil Engineering, 10(1), 53-70.
3. Moradpour, S., & Dehestani, M. (2019). Optimal DDBD Procedure for Designing Steel Structures with Nonlinear Fluid Viscous Dampers. Structures, 22, 154-174. [DOI:10.1016/j.istruc.2019.08.005]
4. Idels, O., & Lavan, O. (2021). Optimization‐based Seismic Design of Steel Moment‐resisting Frames with Nonlinear Viscous Dampers. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 28(1), Article e2655. [DOI:10.1002/stc.2655]
5. De Domenico, D., Ricciardi, G., & Takewaki, I. (2019). Design Strategies of Viscous Dampers for Seismic Protection of Building Structures: a Review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 118, 144-165. [DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.024]
6. Symans, M. D., Constantinou, M. C. (1995). Development and Experimental Study of Semi-active Fluid Damping Devices for Seismic Protection of Structures (No.NCEER-95-0011). National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
7. Kobori, T., Takahashi, M., Nasu, T., Niwa, N., & Ogasawara, K. (1993). Seismic Response Controlled Structure with Active Variable Stiffness System. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 22(11), 925-941. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.4290221102]
8. Kurata, N., Kobori, T., Takahashi, M., Niwa, N., & Midorikawa, H. (1999). Actual Seismic Response Controlled Building with Semi‐active Damper System. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 28(11), 1427-1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1427::AID-EQE876>3.0.CO;2-# [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:113.0.CO;2-#]
9. Gavin, H. P., & Aldemir, U. (2005). Optimal Control of Earthquake Response Using Semiactive Isolation. Engineering Mechanics, 131(8), 769-776. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:8(769)]
10. Pourzeynali, S., & Mousanejad, T. (2010). Optimization of Semi-active Control of Seismically Excited Buildings Using Genetic Algorithms. Scientia Iranica, 17(1), 26-38.
11. Oliveira, F., Botto, M. A., Suleman, & A., Morais, P. (2012, July). Semi-active Viscous Damper for Controlling Civil Engineering Structures Subjected to Earthquakes. 10th Portuguese Conference on Automatic Control, Funchal, Portugal.
12. Oliveira, F., Morais, P., & Suleman, A. (2012, September) Semi-active Control of a Fluid Viscous Damper for Vibration Mitigation. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
13. Hazaveh, N. K., Rodgers, G. W., Chase, J. G., & Pampanin, S. (2017). Reshaping Structural Hysteresis Response with Semi-active Viscous Damping. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(4), 1789-1806. [DOI:10.1007/s10518-016-0036-z]
14. Hazaveh, N. K., Rodgers, G. W., Chase, J. G., & Pampanin, S. (2017). Experimental Test and Validation of a Direction-and Displacement-Dependent Viscous Damper. Engineering Mechanics, 143(11), Article e04017132. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001354]
15. Hazaveh, N., Rodgers, G. W., Pampanin, S., & Chase, J. G. (2016). Damping Reduction Factors and Code‐based Design Equation for Structures Using Semi‐active Viscous Dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 45(15), 2533-2550. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.2782]
16. Cardone, D., Perrone, G., & Piesco, V. (2019). Developing Collapse Fragility Curves for Base‐isolated Buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 48(1), 78-102. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.3126]
17. Shoaei, P., Orimi, H. T., & Zahrai, S. M. (2018). Seismic Reliability-based Design of Inelastic Base-isolated Structures with Lead-rubber Bearing Systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 115, 589-605. [DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.033]
18. Castaldo, P., Amendola, G., & Palazzo, B. (2017). Seismic Fragility and Reliability of Structures Isolated by Friction Pendulum Devices: Seismic Reliability‐based Design (SRBD). Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(3), 425-446. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.2798]
19. Khansefid, A., Maghsoudi-Barmi, A., & Khaloo, A. (2019). Seismic Protection of LNG Tanks with Reliability Based Optimally Designed Combined Rubber Isolator and Friction Damper. Earthquakes and Structures, 16(5), 523-532.
20. Öncü-Davas, S., & Alhan, C. (2019). Probabilistic Behavior of Semi-active Isolated Buildings under Pulse-like Earthquakes. Smart Structures and Systems. 23(3), 227-242.
21. Bakhshinezhad, S., & Mohebbi, M. (2021). Multiple Failure Function Based Fragility Curves for Structures Equipped with TMD. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 20(2), 471-482. [DOI:10.1007/s11803-021-2032-9]
22. Bakhshinezhad, S., & Mohebbi, M. (2019). Multiple Failure Criteria-based Fragility Curves for Structures Equipped with SATMDs. Earthquakes and Structures, 17(5), 463-475.
23. Bakhshinezhad, S., & Mohebbi, M. (2019). Fragility Curves for Structures Equipped with Optimal SATMDs. Optimization in Civil Engineering, 9(3), 437-455.
24. Mohebbi, M., & Bakhshinezhad, S. (2021). Multiple Performance Criteria-based Risk Assessment for Structures Equipped with MR Dampers. Earthquakes and Structures, 20(5), 495-512. [DOI:10.1007/s11803-021-2032-9]
25. Hadidi, A., Azar, B. F., & Shirgir, S. (2019). Reliability Assessment of Semi-active Control of Structures with MR Damper. Earthquakes and Structures, 17(2), 131-141.
26. Cha, Y. J., & Bai, J. W. (2016). Seismic Fragility Estimates of a Moment-resisting Frame Building Controlled by MR Dampers Using Performance-based Design. Engineering Structures, 116, 192-202. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.055]
27. Bagherkhani, A., & Baghlani, A. (2021). Reliability Assessment of MR Fluid Dampers in Passive and Semi-active Seismic Control of Structures. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 63, Article e103114. [DOI:10.1016/j.probengmech.2020.103114]
28. Tubaldi, E., Barbato, M., & Dall'Asta, A. (2014). Performance-based Seismic Risk Assessment for Buildings Equipped with Linear and Nonlinear Viscous Dampers. Engineering Structures, 78, 90-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.052]
29. Tubaldi, E., Barbato, M., & Dall'Asta, A. (2016). Efficient Approach for the Reliability-based Design of Linear Damping Devices for Seismic Protection of Buildings. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2(2), c4015009. [DOI:10.1061/AJRUA6.0000858]
30. Dall'Asta, A., Scozzese, F., Ragni, L., & Tubaldi, E. (2017). Effect of the Damper Property Variability on the Seismic Reliability of Linear Systems Equipped with Viscous Dampers. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(11), 5025-5053. [DOI:10.1007/s10518-017-0169-8]
31. Altieri, D., Tubaldi, E., De Angelis, M., Patelli, E., & Dall'Asta, A. (2018). Reliability-based Optimal Design of Nonlinear Viscous Dampers for the Seismic Protection of Structural Systems. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(2), 963-982. [DOI:10.1007/s10518-017-0233-4]
32. Dall′ Asta, A., Tubaldi, E., & Ragni, L. (2016). Influence of the Nonlinear Behavior of Viscous Dampers on the Seismic Demand Hazard of Building Frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 45(1), 149-169. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.2623]
33. Güneyisi, E. M., & Altay, G. (2008). Seismic Fragility Assessment of Effectiveness of Viscous Dampers in R/C Buildings Under Scenario Earthquakes. Structural Safety, 30(5), 461-480. [DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.06.001]
34. Lavan, O., & Avishur, M. (2013). Seismic Behavior of Viscously Damped Yielding Frames Under Structural and Damping Uncertainties. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11(6), 2309-2332. [DOI:10.1007/s10518-013-9479-7]
35. Scozzese, F., Gioiella, L., Dall'Asta, A., Ragni, L., & Tubaldi, E. (2021). Influence of Viscous Dampers Ultimate Capacity on the Seismic Reliability of Building Structures. Structural Safety, 91, Article e102096. [DOI:10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102096]
36. Khansefid, A., & Ahmadizadeh, M. (2016). An Investigation of the Effects of Structural Nonlinearity on the Seismic Performance Degradation of Active and Passive Control Systems Used for Supplemental Energy Dissipation. Vibration and Control, 22(16), 3544-3554. [DOI:10.1177/1077546314563969]
37. Valášek, M., Novak, M., Šika, Z., & Vaculin, O. (1997). Extended Ground-hook-new Concept of Semi-active Control of Truck's Suspension. Vehicle System Dynamics, 27, 289-303. [DOI:10.1080/00423119708969333]
38. Koo, J. H. (2003). Using Magneto-rheological Dampers in Semiactive Tuned Vibration Absorbers to Control Structural Vibrations. Doctoral Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
39. Ji, H. R., Moon, Y. J., Kim, C. H., & Lee, I. W. (2005, December). Structural Vibration Control Using Semiactive Tuned Mass Damper. 18th KKCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, KAIST, Taiwan, 18-20.
40. Setareh, M. (2001). Application of Semi‐active Tuned Mass Dampers to Base‐excited Systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 30(3), 449-462. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.19]
41. Krasnicki EJ. (1980).The Experimental Performance of an On-Off Active Damper. 51th Shock and Vibration Symposium, San Diego, USA.
42. Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.141]
43. Jalayer, F., & Cornell, C. A. (2009). Alternative Non‐linear Demand Estimation Methods for Probability‐based Seismic Assessments. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 38(8), 951-972. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.876]
44. Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., & Foutch, D. A. (2009). Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines. Journal of structural engineering, 128(4), 526-533. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)]
45. Taylor, E. D. (2007). The Development of Fragility Relationships for Controlled Structures .Doctoral Dissertation. Washington University.
46. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
47. Azimi, S., Karami, K., & Nagarajaiah, S. (2021). Developing a Semi-active Adjustable Stiffness Device Using Integrated Damage Tracking and Adaptive Stiffness Mechanism. Engineering Structures, 238, Article e112036. [DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112036]
48. Iervolino, I., & Cornell, C. A. (2005). Record Selection for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Structures. Earthquake Spectra, 21(3), 685-713. [DOI:10.1193/1.1990199]
49. Kiani, J., Camp, C., & Pezeshk, S. (2018). On the Number of Required Response History Analyses. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(11), 5195-5226. [DOI:10.1007/s10518-018-0381-1]
50. Jalayer, F., Ebrahimian, H., Miano, A., Manfredi, G., & Sezen, H. (2017). Analytical Fragility Assessment Using Unscaled Ground Motion Records. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(15), 2639-2663. [DOI:10.1002/eqe.2922]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author